企业AI+敏捷赋能专家Enterprise AI + Agile Empowerment Expert
不讲黑话 · 听完就懂 · 做了就变 · 杰全道咨询 No Jargon · Real Clarity · Actual Change · Quandao Consulting
方法论 · 敏捷+AI 双轮驱动Methodology · Agile + AI Dual-Wheel Drive
敏捷轮 · 组织效能Agile Wheel · Org Effectiveness
人机协同Human × AI Sync
AI轮 · 执行效能AI Wheel · Execution Effectiveness
敏捷负责人的协作与决策,AI负责执行的速度与精度——两轮交汇处,才是企业真正的AI+敏捷竞争力。 Agile drives how people collaborate and decide; AI drives the speed and precision of execution — where the two wheels meet is where real AI + Agile advantage lives.
合作品牌Brands I've Worked With
免费在线自测Free Online Self-Assessment
覆盖 9 大核心管理维度,适用于制造业、零售、美妆、SaaS、汽车等各行业企业。填写基本信息、逐项打分,系统立即生成专属雷达图与成熟度评级——不用等我回复,现在就能看到团队站在哪个位置。 Covering 9 core management dimensions, built for manufacturing, retail, beauty, SaaS, automotive and beyond. Fill in your basics, score each item, and get your radar chart and maturity rating instantly — no need to wait for a reply.
服务Services
无论你是需要系统性解决组织问题的高管,还是需要为团队定制高质量培训的HR负责人——我只做一件事:让改变真正发生。 Whether you're an executive needing systemic organizational change, or an HR leader seeking high-quality custom training — I do one thing: make change actually happen.
适合 → CEO · CIO · CTO · PMOFor → CEO · CIO · CTO · PMO
¥9,000 / 天起day, starting rate
你花这笔钱,能拿到什么?——典型客户在合作结束后拿到的结果: What do you actually get? Here's what typical clients walk away with:
适合 → HR Director · HRBP · 培训负责人For → HR Director · HRBP · L&D Leaders
¥15,000 / 天起day, starting rate
不买"听完就忘的课"——培训结束后,你的团队能拿到: Not "forget-it-by-Monday" training. After the session, your team walks away with:
企业内训课程Corporate Training
从基层团队到C级高管,从半天工作坊到两天深度训练营。所有课程均根据企业实际场景定制,不套路,不讲教科书,确保学员带得走、用得上。 From frontline teams to C-suite executives, from half-day workshops to two-day immersive bootcamps. Every course is customized to your organization's real context — no off-the-shelf content, no theory without practice.
课程日费率 ¥15,000 起 · 按天数与人数定制报价 Day rate from ¥15,000 · final quote based on days & group size
融合 Scrum Alliance · SAFe · IDEO U · Agile Business Consortium · Agile Leadership Journey 六大全球权威框架,覆盖实体产品 × 数字化产品双轮驱动,帮助企业构建从初级执行到高级策略的全链路产品竞争力。
Integrating six global authority frameworks including Scrum Alliance, SAFe, IDEO U, Agile Business Consortium and Agile Leadership Journey. Covers physical and digital product dual-track delivery to build full-chain product competitiveness.
从想法到验证,用8周时间完成真实的创新闭环。2周黑客松孵化商业假设,6周冲刺将假设转化为可运营的MVP——不是培训,是实战。 From idea to validated MVP in 8 weeks. 2-week hackathon to form business hypotheses, 6-week sprint to turn hypotheses into operational MVPs — not training, real execution.
联系我Get in Touch
填写下方表单,我会根据你描述的情况,在48小时内给你一份「组织效能快速诊断报告」——找出你现在最大的效能漏洞在哪里,以及可以立刻开始做的3个动作。完全免费,无任何销售压力。 Fill in the form and I'll send you a free Org Effectiveness Quick Audit within 48 hours — identifying your biggest efficiency gap and 3 actions you can start immediately. Free, zero sales pressure.
关于杰哥About Roger Chung
"我不是学了敏捷去教别人的顾问。我是在真实项目里把它用出来,才开始帮别人的人。" "I didn't learn agile to teach it. I used it in real projects first — then started helping others."
从工程师到项目经理,从敏捷教练到独立顾问——我的每一步都在回答同一个问题:组织怎样才能真正动起来?
我服务过欧莱雅、宝马车联网、国家电网、拜耳等企业,涵盖科技、制造、金融、快消、汽车行业。我不讲标准流程,我善于读懂你公司的现场,用核心思维融合实际情况,给出真正能落地的解法。
近年来,我把这套判断力沉淀成「敏捷+AI双轮驱动」方法论:敏捷轮解决人的协作与决策效能,AI轮解决企业的执行效能,两轮交汇处由人把关意图、审查与决策,AI承接执行、交付与辅助——这是我现在为企业提供咨询与培训的核心主张。
From engineer to project manager, from agile coach to independent consultant — every step has been answering the same question: how do organizations actually move?
I've worked with L'Oreal, BMW Connected Vehicle, State Grid, Bayer, and more. I don't follow standard playbooks — I read your specific situation and apply core thinking to build solutions that actually land.
In recent years I've distilled that judgment into the "Agile + AI Dual-Wheel Drive" methodology: the Agile wheel drives how people collaborate and decide, the AI wheel drives how the enterprise executes, and where the two wheels meet, people own intent, review and decisions while AI owns execution, delivery and assistance — this is now the core proposition behind my consulting and training work.
3S创新体系 · Roger Chung原创方法论The 3S Framework · Roger Chung's Original Methodology
大多数企业的创新失败,不是因为缺少想法,而是因为战略、能力、执行三个层面彼此脱节。3S框架提供了一套贯穿上下层级的系统性方法,让创新真正落地。 Most organizations don't fail at innovation because of a lack of ideas — they fail because Strategy, Skill, and Sprint operate in silos. The 3S Framework connects all three layers into one closed-loop system.
3S框架已系统化整理于著作《To Survive in the AI Era: Enterprise's 3S Innovation Workbook》 The 3S Framework is fully documented in To Survive in the AI Era: Enterprise's 3S Innovation Workbook
获取书籍 ↗Get the Book ↗亚马逊出版著作Published on Amazon KDP
从创新框架到业务路线图,从战略设计到敏捷落地——完整覆盖企业效能提升的全链路。 From innovation frameworks to business roadmaps, from strategy design to agile execution — a complete system for enterprise effectiveness.
第一部Book 1
围绕3S框架(战略·能力·冲刺)展开,专为企业决策者、高管和顾问设计的闭环创新手册。评分9.5/10。 Built around the 3S Framework (Strategy · Skill · Sprint). A closed-loop innovation workbook for executives, founders and consultants. Rated 9.5/10.
第二部Book 2
为什么90%的企业完成所有开发功能后,依然无法实现业务增长?本书首创「双轨制耦合交付体系」,帮助企业从「功能交付工厂」蜕变为「业务价值引擎」。 Why do 90% of companies fail to achieve business growth after completing all features? This book introduces the Dual-Track Coupled Delivery System — transforming organizations from feature factories to business value engines.
洞察Insights
人效优化
Talent Effectiveness
某制造企业生产总监,年薪50万,72%的工作时间耗在报销核对、PPT格式调整、物料协调上。核心的产线优化、供应链降本,根本没时间做。6个月后,这个数字降到了8%——不是换了人,是换了机制……
A manufacturing plant director. ¥500K salary. 72% of working hours spent on expense reconciliation, PPT formatting, and materials coordination. Zero time for production optimization or cost reduction. Six months later, that 72% dropped to 8% — same person, different system…
三大根因:① 无岗位价值分级——高管承接所有层级的工作;② 无事务拦截机制——所有琐事直接对接高管;③ 无匹配的考核导向——KPI考核琐事完成率而非核心成果。
Three root causes: ① No role-value tiering — executives handle all levels of work; ② No task-filtering mechanism — all requests go directly to the executive; ③ Misaligned KPIs — measuring task completion instead of strategic outcomes.
三步解法:① 岗位价值分级(核心/重要/常规/低价值四级);② 配置商务助理推行事务拦截;③ 重设高管KPI,仅考核战略落地、业务增长、团队成长三个维度。
Three-step fix: ① Value-tier all tasks (Critical / Important / Routine / Low-value); ② Assign a business assistant with task-filtering rules; ③ Rebuild executive KPIs around strategy execution, business growth, and team development only.
企业最大的浪费,不是员工摸鱼,而是把高价值的人放在低价值的事上。
The biggest waste in any organization isn't employees slacking — it's putting high-value people on low-value work.
流程优化
Process Design
一个需求走47个签字,少则3天多则半个月。出了问题回头追责,每个人都说"前面的人已经看过了"。层层审批不是在管控风险,是在把责任彻底稀释……
One request. 47 signatures. Three days minimum, two weeks typical. When something goes wrong, everyone says "the person before me already reviewed it." Layers of approval don't control risk — they dissolve accountability…
某财务科技公司改造成果:审批节点从47个压缩至最多21个,平均审批时长从2个月缩短至4小时,因审批不严造成的需求延期率从80%降至10%以下,审批责任明确率100%。
Results from a fintech company: Approval nodes cut from 47 to 21 max. Average approval time: 2 months → 4 hours. Requirement delay rate due to approval issues: 80% → under 10%. Accountability clarity: 100%.
三步根治:① 审批节点瘦身,最多3个节点,明确"谁申请谁负责、谁审批谁担责";② 分级授权,按金额和事项类型下放决策权;③ 审批追责制度,审批人对结果终身负责。
Three fixes: ① Slim approval nodes to 3 max, with clear ownership; ② Tiered authorization by amount and type; ③ Lifetime accountability — approvers own outcomes, not just signatures.
层层审批不是管控,是推卸责任。权责对等,才是真正的风险管控。
Layered approvals aren't control — they're distributed blame. Real risk management means matching authority with accountability.
组织效能
Organizational Efficiency
麦肯锡调研显示,66%的高管承认自己公司效率极低。人越来越多,速度越来越慢——以前几个人一天搞定的事,现在几十个人要做一周。规模越大,效率越低,增长越慢……
McKinsey research shows 66% of executives admit their organization is highly inefficient. More people, slower results — what three people finished in a day now takes thirty people a week. The bigger you grow, the slower you move…
规模化低效的三大根源:① 流程在部门间断裂推诿,无完整价值流;② 决策权集中在上层,离业务最远的人在拍板;③ 员工不清楚自己的工作在为客户创造什么价值,无效工作大量存在。
Three root causes of scaling inefficiency: ① Processes break and stall at department boundaries; ② Decision authority sits furthest from the customer; ③ Employees don't know what value their work creates — so non-value work proliferates.
三个核心原则:① 端到端价值流打通,消除部门墙;② 最小授权单元,让听得见炮火的人做决策;③ 全员价值共识,从根源杜绝无效工作。
Three core principles: ① Build end-to-end value streams, eliminate department silos; ② Minimum authorization unit — let those closest to the customer decide; ③ Organization-wide value clarity — eliminate non-value work at the root.
没有效率的规模,越大越危险。企业的增长,靠的是效率提升,不是人员扩张。
Scale without efficiency is a liability, not an asset. Growth comes from doing more with what you have — not from hiring more people to do the same things slowly.
FAQ
关于企业效能、敏捷转型和创新管理,这些是我被问得最多的问题。The questions I get asked most about enterprise effectiveness, agile transformation, and innovation management.
实战知识库Practice Knowledge Base
每一篇都来自真实项目的实战复盘——不讲教科书,只讲在客户现场真正有用的那些。 Every entry comes from real engagements — not textbooks. What actually works on the ground, and why.
Scrum · 敏捷框架Agile
硬套标准Scrum的结果是Sprint计划两天后因合规被推翻,迭代节奏崩溃。我们的解法不是取消Scrum,而是在框架外加了一条缓冲带……Forcing standard Scrum in compliance-heavy orgs causes Sprint plans to collapse within days. The fix isn't to abandon Scrum — it's to add a buffer layer outside the framework…
阅读实战案例 →Read the case →
双钻模型 · 创新方法Double Diamond · Innovation
大多数团队以为自己在发散,实际上是在为决策者已有的预设答案寻找论据。真正到位的发散必须同时满足两个条件……Most teams think they're diverging — they're actually finding evidence for conclusions already made. Real divergence requires two conditions simultaneously…
阅读实战案例 →Read the case →
八大浪费 · 精益管理8 Wastes · Lean
传统八大浪费聚焦执行层,但有一种更致命更隐蔽的浪费——不决策、假装决策、翻盘式决策。它放大其他所有浪费……The classic 8 wastes focus on execution. But there's a more lethal, invisible one — non-decisions, fake decisions, and reversed decisions. It amplifies all others…
阅读实战案例 →Read the case →
Kanban · 敏捷框架Agile
看板落地失败的常见原因不是板子画得不对,而是只搬来了可视化的表象,没引入限制在制品和管理流动的内核……Most Kanban failures aren't about drawing the board wrong. They import the visual without the core: WIP limits and flow management…
阅读实战案例 →Read the case →
SAFe · 规模化敏捷Scaled Agile
PI Planning的核心价值不在于两天的时间盒,而在于跨团队依赖关系被显性化、被面对面协商这个过程。我们把它压缩成了一天……PI Planning's value isn't the two-day timebox — it's making cross-team dependencies visible and negotiated face-to-face. We compressed it to one day…
阅读实战案例 →Read the case →
LeSS vs SoS · 规模化敏捷Scaled Agile
选框架的核心变量不是团队数量,而是产品边界和团队耦合度。选错框架的代价是直接而隐蔽的……The real decision variable isn't team count — it's product boundary and coupling degree. Choosing wrong has direct and hidden costs…
阅读实战案例 →Read the case →
精益管理 · 服务型团队Lean · Service Teams
服务型团队的库存是看不见的:未回复的邮件、待审的方案、进行中的需求讨论。它们不占物理空间,却占用了最稀缺的资源——注意力……Service team inventory is invisible: unread emails, pending proposals, open requirement discussions. No physical space — but consuming the scarcest resource: attention…
阅读实战案例 →Read the case →
斯坦福五步法 · 创新方法Design Thinking · Innovation
B2B场景中"用户"和"客户"往往不是同一个人。硬套标准共情做法,要么拿不到真实信息,要么拿到的是被精心挑选的客套话……In B2B, "user" and "customer" are rarely the same person. Standard empathy methods either fail to get real information or return carefully curated pleasantries…
阅读实战案例 →Read the case →
Google HEART · 用户体验UX Measurement
HEART在B2B产品和企业内部系统中面临同一挑战:没有大规模数据。但这不意味着用不了,而是需要"小样本替代"策略……HEART faces the same challenge in B2B and internal systems: no large-scale data. But that doesn't mean it's unusable — it means small-sample substitution…
阅读实战案例 →Read the case →
用户体验设计 · 服务设计UX Design · Service Design
一张体验地图贴到墙上时,各部门的第一反应是沉默。地图清楚显示,客户为了完成一件事被迫在五个部门间辗转……When an experience map goes on the wall, departments go silent. The map shows clearly: the customer crosses five departments just to complete one thing…
阅读实战案例 →Read the case →